Computer vision that assists, not decides
Turnstone reads markings from clear part photos and ranks likely text. A quality professional always confirms, corrects, or records a no-read.
Supportive tools for aerospace quality teams
Computer vision that helps people get critical details right
Turnstone gives quality and warehouse teams a calmer, reviewable way to handle physical-part information: surface markings with computer vision, keep certificate evidence organized, and make uncertainty visible before it becomes an avoidable human error.
Built for MRO teams, repair stations, parts rooms, and aerospace manufacturers.
Human-confirmed by design. Computer-vision reads are suggestions, never an automatic quality or inventory decision.
Evidence is not a certification decision. A stored document supports review; your qualified team determines compliance and airworthiness.
RFID remains available where it fits. Known tags can support a physical inventory workflow without becoming the center of the quality process.
The quality workspace
Build a better check into the work, not more work around it
The goal is not to replace experienced people. It is to give them the right evidence, a clear next step, and a durable record—so fewer details depend on a rushed manual handoff.
Quality control with a review trail
Capture the part, see the model suggestion, and keep the final human decision with the supporting photo instead of relying on memory or loose notes.
Certification requirements and evidence
Record the certification types a part requires, then store the actual certificate document against the relevant site and lot, batch, heat, or serial number.
Supportive tools for the exceptions
When the image or data is unclear, Turnstone makes uncertainty visible so a person can investigate before an avoidable error becomes a downstream problem.
What the team can review
Useful evidence stays close to the decision
Turnstone preserves what was seen, what the model suggested, and what a person confirmed. It does not certify a part, make a safety determination, or replace the judgment required by your quality system.
- Reviewed markings
- A human-confirmed part number, serial number, other marking, or an explicit no-read
- Part requirements
- The certification types the quality team has recorded for a part number
- Lot-level evidence
- Certificate documents stored with the applicable lot, batch, heat, or serial number
- Visible uncertainty
- Suggestions, corrections, and missing evidence that need a person’s attention
Implementation
Start with the checks where the consequences of a missed detail are highest
A pilot is configured around one real workflow, the people who review it, and the evidence they need. We validate the process before asking a team to rely on it in regular operations.
Set up the quality context
Turnstone imports the relevant part information and records the certification requirements that the quality team needs to check.
Capture and review the physical evidence
A clear photo gives computer vision the context to suggest a marking. The reviewer can accept it, correct it, classify it, or mark it unreadable.
Build a record people can trust
Reviewed markings, uploaded certificate evidence, and open questions remain visible to the team rather than disappearing into a manual handoff.
A no-read is a useful outcome. When a marking cannot be read reliably, Turnstone keeps that uncertainty explicit instead of inventing a value or forcing a match.
Pilot discussion
Tell us where a more supportive quality workflow would make the biggest difference
We will start with the physical parts, review steps, certificate evidence, and handoffs where clearer information can reduce avoidable human error.